white paper

Why heatsinks aren't the one-size-fits-all solution for electronics cooling

Using 3D thermal simulation to optimize heatsink placement and efficiency.

A 3D cross-section view of an electronic device, showing the internal components like circuit boards, heatsinks, and airflow patterns represented by colorful arrows flowing through the device.

Heatsinks are often perceived to be the magic answer to all electronic cooling challenges. A heatsink spreads heat to pass to the air over a much larger surface area than it would otherwise. Air then carries the heat away, cooling the electronics that generated it. So, why not place a heatsink on any thermally critical component?

Heatsinks, here, there, everywhere.

Heatsinks are often hailed as the ultimate solution to electronics cooling dilemmas. By dispersing heat, they effectively increase the surface area through which heat can dissipate into the surrounding air. This process facilitates cooling for the electronics, which generates heat. However, one might wonder why heatsinks aren't simply placed atop every thermally critical component.

The answer lies in simulation. Product designers can intricately model a product or its components by utilizing advanced 3D thermal simulation and analysis tools like Simcenter Flotherm. Through simulation, designers gain insights into the complex interplay of air and heat flow within and around the device. This wealth of information empowers them to make informed decisions regarding the strategic placement and utilization of heatsinks, optimizing cooling efficiency where it's most needed.

Share

Related resources